horak.
LAWYERS · PARTNERSCHAFT MBB /
SPECIALIST LAWYERS / PATENT ATTORNEYS /

TIERRECHTSANWALT: Animal law firm

Equine law, animal purchases, keeper liability and animal welfare

English home · Practice areas · News · Enquire · Deutsch

This page concerns German law and applicable EU rules. Foreign-law questions require separate assessment.

Commercial animal keeping combines contract, welfare, health and operational permits.

Commercial keeping and remedies

Species and systems have different special rules. Missing detailed provisions do not remove general welfare duties. Medicines and transport add further regimes.

Contracts, disputes and proceedings

We assist with supply contracts, inspections and challenges. Exoneration under section 833 sentence 2 BGB depends on statutory purpose and proof, not species alone.

Practical approach

We clarify goals, parties and chronology, assess records and evidence, then discuss options, procedure and costs. Provide full regulatory decisions and court documents with service dates.

Further information · Request advice

In depth: operations and legal responsibility

Animal businesses combine continuous care with commercial and regulatory demands. We first establish the operator, actual activities and required permits or notifications. Permission for one part does not necessarily cover expansion. Feeding, health checks, records and emergency responsibilities should be clearly allocated. Actual operations must be compared with contractual task descriptions.

Identifying and addressing disputes early

Inspections require attention to specific findings, measurements and affected animal groups. Improvements should be recorded and checked for effectiveness. Commercial interests inform proportionate measures but do not remove legal requirements. Supplier, service-provider or insurance claims may exist alongside regulatory issues. Customers may seek compensation for interrupted services. Responses should therefore consider supply chains, staff and contracts.

Four practical examples

The following scenarios are illustrative, not accounts of actual instructions or promised outcomes. Legal assessment depends on the facts that can be established.

1. Livestock inspection

The authority challenges care and records. Assess groups, findings and internal checks. Implement and document organisational improvements.

2. Animal injures a visitor

An animal in a commercial operation injures someone. Clarify use, care and animal risk. Statutory exoneration is not a blanket business exemption.

3. New animals introduce illness

A herd becomes ill after purchases. Investigate origin, quarantine, findings and other causes. Coordinate contractual claims with disease-control duties.

4. Business loses a buyer

A contract ends following welfare allegations. Compare standards, assessment procedure and termination rights. Regulatory compliance does not necessarily fulfil every contractual promise.

Documents, evidence and next steps

Preparation requires permits, operational descriptions, inspection reports, supply and care contracts, and current herd and treatment records. Financial claims require receipts and clear calculations. Settlement may combine adjusted processes, realistic implementation periods and agreed checks. Concurrent administrative, civil and investigative proceedings require consistent factual accounts and respect for each procedure’s rights.

TierSchG: operations and internal checks · Send an enquiry: all fields optional

Scroll to top