English home · Practice areas · News · Enquire · Deutsch
This page concerns German law and applicable EU rules. Foreign-law questions require separate assessment.
Bites, dangerous-dog classifications and ownership disputes may trigger different claims and proceedings. We advise keepers, injured parties, breeders and commercial facilities.
Dogs are not legally things
Section 90a BGB provides that animals are not things; property rules generally apply correspondingly unless otherwise provided. Ownership, possession and welfare responsibility require joint assessment.
Dangerous-dog status, leads, muzzles and temperament tests
Requirements arise particularly from state law and the individual order. Classification triggers and consequences vary between states. A temperament test does not always remove conditions automatically. We examine hearings, facts, reasons and remedies.
Bites and liability insurance
Personal injury and property damage may create claims against keepers and others. Contributory fault, other animals and policy terms affect assessment. Notify insurers promptly and preserve witness and documentary evidence.
Purchase, illness and rehoming
Dog purchases turn on agreements, health information, risk transfer and party status. Later illness is not always a seller-responsible defect. Association rehoming depends on the actual contract.
Tenancy, neighbours and separation
Keeping animals in rented homes requires assessment of terms and circumstances. Document actual noise or danger. After separation, return and allocation depend particularly on ownership and potentially family law; there is no general child-law equivalent of animal contact rights.
Coordinating proceedings
Damages and civil litigation · Regulatory conditions and urgent applications · Defence after an incident
Request advice
Please describe your concern, the parties and deadlines. Contracts, decisions, findings and correspondence help the initial assessment. We agree the scope and cost of instructions with you.
In depth: understanding regulatory measures
Inspection reports, hearings and binding orders serve different functions. First identify the document, addressee and specific obligation. Legal basis, findings and proportionality are decisive. Regulatory assessments are best tested against concrete findings, documented processes and realistic improvements. Detailed engagement with complaints is often more useful than general denial.
Identifying and addressing disputes early
A challenge alone may not prevent enforcement of immediately enforceable orders. Urgent applications differ according to whether suspension or positive regulatory action is sought. Objection procedures and competence may depend on state law. Instructions on remedies, service and the complete file matter. Submission deadlines must not be confused with statutory challenge periods. Parallel fine or criminal proceedings require coordinated communication.
Four practical examples
The following scenarios are illustrative, not accounts of actual instructions or promised outcomes. Legal assessment depends on the facts that can be established.
1. Dangerous-dog classification after a bite
The authority imposes conditions. Review events, injuries and state law. Witnesses and video may be crucial to understanding behaviour.
2. Challenging a muzzle order
The keeper considers the condition excessive. Assess reasons, risk prognosis and less restrictive measures. A challenge does not always suspend compliance.
3. Missing competence certificate
A keeper receives an official request. Identify applicable state rules and alternative evidence. Another state’s requirements cannot automatically be applied.
4. Dog injures a carer
A person is bitten during agreed care. Keeper liability, supervision and contract require separate review. Insurance and possible contributory conduct also matter.
Documents, evidence and next steps
Prepare the decision and annexes, proof of service, inspection reports, dated photos and expert reports. Businesses also need permits, plans, care arrangements and internal checks. Prompt improvements may be proposed without accepting all allegations. Where removal, sale or closure threatens, identify irreversible consequences before judgment and how animal care can be secured.
TierSchG: regulatory orders · Send an enquiry: all fields optional