horak.
LAWYERS · PARTNERSCHAFT MBB /
SPECIALIST LAWYERS / PATENT ATTORNEYS /

TIERRECHTSANWALT: Animal law firm

Equine law, animal purchases, keeper liability and animal welfare

Animal keeper liability

English home · Practice areas · News · Enquire · Deutsch

This page concerns German law and applicable EU rules. Foreign-law questions require separate assessment.

After an accident, assess keeper status, characteristic animal risk, loss and insurance.

Who is liable?

Section 833 sentence 1 BGB generally imposes strict keeper liability, including the requirement that characteristic animal risk materialised. Supervisors, businesses or others may also be liable for their own breaches. Owner and keeper may differ.

Exception for working animals

Section 833 sentence 2 allows exoneration for domestic animals serving profession, trade or livelihood. The keeper must prove care or inevitability. Species alone does not decide; horses may be private leisure animals.

Loss and contributory responsibility

Treatment, property damage, earnings loss and human pain and suffering may be relevant. Assess contributory fault and other animals separately. Necessary animal treatment costs can exceed the animal’s value, depending on circumstances.

Documents and advice

Please provide relevant contracts, decisions, supporting documents and a short chronology, including deadlines.

Further advice · Send an enquiry

In depth: keeping, use and responsibility

Species alone does not determine duties. Purpose, actual care, location and commercial activity matter. Contracts coexist with public-law health and welfare duties. Keeper, owner and supervisor may be different people. Establish these roles from the facts before assessing liability.

Identifying and addressing disputes early

For damage, reconstruct events, animal behaviour and others’ contributions. Photos, witnesses and prompt findings often outweigh later general accounts. Insurance and liability differ: a policy does not cover every use. Regulatory complaints require identification of the alleged risk or breach. Private agreements do not automatically bind authorities.

Four practical examples

The following scenarios are illustrative, not accounts of actual instructions or promised outcomes. Legal assessment depends on the facts that can be established.

1. Dog bites a passer-by

Treatment and pain-and-suffering compensation are claimed. Assess animal risk, keeper status and contributory conduct. Give insurers a complete account.

2. Horse shies in traffic

A vehicle is damaged. Reconstruct events, animal and driver behaviour. Multiple causes may require a separate liability allocation.

3. Working animal escapes

A business-kept domestic animal causes loss. Assess purpose and exoneration specifically. Regular checks and precautions may be decisive evidence.

4. Carer injured

An animal injures a person during agreed care. Assess contract, supervision and accepted risk. Voluntary care does not exclude all compensation.

Documents, evidence and next steps

Provide identification, keeping conditions, care agreements and chronology. Depending on the matter, include insurance, purchase records, invoices and official letters. We prioritise duties and claims. Immediate care and security, evidence, insurer contact, negotiation and litigation must align. Improved processes reduce future risks but do not resolve existing claims.

BGB: animal keeper liability · Send an enquiry: all fields optional

Scroll to top