English home · Practice areas · News · Enquire · Deutsch
This page concerns German law and applicable EU rules. Foreign-law questions require separate assessment.
Directive 98/58/EC sets EU minimum standards for protecting farmed animals. Businesses must also consider national implementing provisions and other applicable EU rules.
Basic requirements
Care, inspections, staff, housing and records are key assessment areas. Requirements depend on species and keeping conditions.
Avoid blanket claims about prohibitions
The Directive does not, without further assessment, establish a uniform ban on every tethering or crate system. Specific rules and transitional provisions must be identified separately.
Practical advice
We support businesses with operating conditions and investment decisions, and organisations assessing keeping conditions. Regulatory proceedings and judicial remedies require specific, evidenced facts.
Documents and advice
Please provide relevant contracts, decisions, supporting documents and a short chronology, including deadlines.
In depth: operations and legal responsibility
Animal businesses combine continuous care with commercial and regulatory demands. We first establish the operator, actual activities and required permits or notifications. Permission for one part does not necessarily cover expansion. Feeding, health checks, records and emergency responsibilities should be clearly allocated. Actual operations must be compared with contractual task descriptions.
Identifying and addressing disputes early
Inspections require attention to specific findings, measurements and affected animal groups. Improvements should be recorded and checked for effectiveness. Commercial interests inform proportionate measures but do not remove legal requirements. Supplier, service-provider or insurance claims may exist alongside regulatory issues. Customers may seek compensation for interrupted services. Responses should therefore consider supply chains, staff and contracts.
Four practical examples
The following scenarios are illustrative, not accounts of actual instructions or promised outcomes. Legal assessment depends on the facts that can be established.
1. Housing lacks suitable resting areas
A keeper relies on established housing practices. Applicable national rules and the animals’ needs are decisive. Longstanding practice does not itself refute a substantiated complaint.
2. Automatic drinking equipment fails
A technical fault temporarily interrupts water supply. Inspection intervals, alarms and emergency responses are assessed. Both the fault and the business’s response matter when evaluating possible breaches.
3. Staff recognise illness late
Several animals receive delayed treatment. Responsibilities, checks and carers’ competence must be established. Delegating tasks without suitable organisation does not resolve responsibility.
4. Authority requires alterations
A business must alter housing. The legal basis, technical reasoning, suitability and implementation deadline are assessed. The Directive and its implementation are not exhaustive technical building specifications for every case.
Documents, evidence and next steps
Preparation requires permits, operational descriptions, inspection reports, supply and care contracts, and current herd and treatment records. Financial claims require receipts and clear calculations. Settlement may combine adjusted processes, realistic implementation periods and agreed checks. Concurrent administrative, civil and investigative proceedings require consistent factual accounts and respect for each procedure’s rights.
TierSchG: operations and internal checks · Send an enquiry: all fields optional